It didn't crash anything, just takes a bit longer to load... not as long as 260 players on flash battles took thoughI mean, I know that even 140v120 crashes the servers but would be good to compensate the peeps that signed up but couldn't join at least.
Sure, it used to fail to load and you had to refresh on the client side, which isn't the same as crashing, but I take your point.It didn't? I remember that it did and everyone had to refresh and/or wait some time at some point.
That's why the massive battles were always staggered, to reduce the load on the server.I mean, normally one world might not cause an issue but many battles at the same time.. not sure.
Actually, twice. Because while the ff map loads, from server side it freeze a bit in a full middle sized, so you have extra 10-15 seconds to change your gear, fill your hp ect without the usual "cant do that stoopid" messege.I mean, I know that even 140v120 crashes the servers at least once
So there is no chance that 5 clothing set bonus will be adjusted at least?Can't we have a little bit more improvement to the James Wilson set?
At least Resistance value of set bonuses of 5 and 6 clothing parts?
I mean.. As it stands.. It won't/doesn't have enough help to Attackers.
So there is no chance that 5 clothing set bonus will be adjusted at least?
10 resist from 55 is just absurd.
Stats also like half of 6.
I'm sure they will fix it but in Colorado we fill it with 130 attackers and 120 defenders so this will put the rest of us Workers and Soldiers at a disadvantage in ranking and possibly getting snubbed and left out so if there is any chance of increasing the total number allowed in the battle that would be nice.
Hi everyone. First of thank you for loving these fortbattles. The attendance is so high i now have tried something new
|