That is just your interpertation. If you act according to the laws of your country (most of the important ones are based on the same morals which are in the bible) you are a good person in my eyes. And we all know what happens to good persons :nowink:
Oh really. Some of us call that the Nuremberg defense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_Orders
Superior Orders (often known as the
Nuremberg Defense or
Lawful Orders) is a plea in a court of law that a soldier not be held guilty for actions which were ordered by a superior office.
[1] The superior orders defense is similar to the doctrine of
respondeat superior in
tort law where a superior is held liable for the actions of a subordinate, and the subordinate may escape liability.
[2] Legal scholars and war crimes tribunals define the superior orders plea as the complement to
Command responsibility and may correlate or distinguish the plea from the doctrine of
respondeat superior.
[3]
One of the most noted uses of this defense was by the accused in the 1945-46
Nuremberg Trials, such that it is also called the "Nuremberg Defense." The Nuremberg Trials were a series of military
tribunals, held by the main victorious
Allied forces of
World War II, most notable for the prosecution of prominent members of the political, military, and economic leadership of the defeated
Nazi Germany. It was during these trials, under the
London Charter of the International Military Tribunal which set them up, that the defense of "Superior Orders" was no longer considered enough to escape punishment; but merely enough to lessen punishment.
[4]
In Mexico, up until around 1950, it was legal, and LAW, to kill an Indian when you saw one. I guess, in your eyes, that killing Indians walking in the street in the 1950s would have made someone a good person in your eyes.
I suggest a comprehensive vision check in your case.