DeletedUser
Please allow me to defend myself... (again...)
Or you have serious problems of textual interpretation or, maybe... you are just the one kidding here... I'm not kidding when i feel offended by your behavior.
---------
(somewhat) "on topic" (and again, exposing my opinion)
I doubt about these "97,3% gypsies"... o_o
Why the hell would anyone want to keep distance from them? I doubt most of the interviewed has ever seen one. Gypsies don't even have a "bad image" around here, in Brazil o_o
I really doubt this research wasn't manipulated in some way.
obs: I'm not trying to "win" any thread. I'm not saying what I say here is the absolute truth. I'm just saying I doubt this research is valid to this topic.
I believe there's a big misunderstanding from who's criticizing me.
You are putting words in my mouth. And yet ignoring my post. Thank you.You're kidding me right? You're going to act all hurt because you indicate that you read what I posted, but you aren't going to bother reading the information provided in the links I gave you,
Or you have serious problems of textual interpretation or, maybe... you are just the one kidding here... I'm not kidding when i feel offended by your behavior.
I said I would do it later. Never said I wouldn't do it. (And it just doesn't matter, anyway)and aren't going to bother researching the issue itself despite the fact you insist on my providing supporting evidence?
---------
(somewhat) "on topic" (and again, exposing my opinion)
I doubt about these "97,3% gypsies"... o_o
Why the hell would anyone want to keep distance from them? I doubt most of the interviewed has ever seen one. Gypsies don't even have a "bad image" around here, in Brazil o_o
I really doubt this research wasn't manipulated in some way.
obs: I'm not trying to "win" any thread. I'm not saying what I say here is the absolute truth. I'm just saying I doubt this research is valid to this topic.
I believe there's a big misunderstanding from who's criticizing me.
Last edited by a moderator: