DeletedUser
Violette, I don't judge you for your actions or anyone else. I just state my opinions in the debates just like you and all the others. I'll be the first to tell you that I am not a good person. I don't match up to God's standards; I fail more than I care to admit.
Then stop condemning others based on standards you yourself don't even attempt to meet.
The person who raised the issue of your personal life was you, and you raised it to prove some kind of point ie: that you are a lovely person. This was a diversionary tactic on your part (whether conscious or unconscious), crying "personality" and playing the poor, misunderstood victim as I stated before, and Hellstromm stated prior to that.However, debates aren't about our personal lives nor personal insults for that matter. In debate hall you can't bring up the opponents personal life or personally insult him. My life has no bearing on my opinions in the debates. Furthermore, there is absolutely no reason for any of us to fight. Debates are supposed to be enjoyable, not petty cat fights over nothing.
As I also stated previously, whether you are a lovely person is a matter of complete disinterest to me and entirely irrelevant to this discussion.
However, the personal example you chose to give did not illustrate that you are a lovely person. It illustrated that you are an incoherent one.
If you are such a failure in your own eyes, and in the eyes of your god, your time would be much better spent endeavouring to remove the plank from your own eye rather than worrying about what specks might be in other people's, let alone fussing over how the universe began. And that is the moral advice you find in your own religious text.
Doing anything other than that makes you a hypocrite according to your bible, as well as to those who observe your incoherent behaviour. And psychologically, it reveals too many attributional biases to even count.
In my experience, it is all but impossible for those who are as aware of their own flaws as a person can be (rather than simply repeating that they deserve to go to hell which is just a form of narcissism) to be anything but non-judgemental and non-dogmatic, with the exception of some few inviolable principles which they do hold themselves up to. And that brings us back to the whole point of my previous post...
Stop condemning others based on standards you yourself don't even attempt to meet. And stop attempting to force the world to conform to them as well. When you learn how to do that, I will happily tell you that you have some integrity, whether I agree with you views or not.