DeletedUser
IC bank own forts? ive only ever seen them as allies....you leearn something new every day
oh no I agree and we have both excused actions by parties on both our sides in the past
but that was within the first week of the treaty being signed
its been over a month now and my point is, she won't even acknowledge that she broke the treaty; so with that attitude, if more attacks are forthcoming from her in this manner, then it really leaves us two choices: end the treaty, or kick ICBank out
...i have seen some excellent fort battles that have been a result of this treaty, and i would hate to lose having these kinds of battles.
And TW would gladly take help from a gunslinger like you, ya dodgy *******.i honestly would honestly rather help defend TW
Then what is wrong with yourself putting as much effort into a straight up 1v1 battle instead of multi nonsense?
As i've said it before:
1. this treaty aim is not to have "good" fort battles, but to limit fort battle numbers and keep forts that alliances already have. So be truthfull about this. If you still thing differently - check how many fort battles treaty members initiated on each other after signing it. Good fort battles only can be fought when there is a chance of winning 1 on 1 fort battles except rare occasions usually end up in slaughter of attackers if defenders gather. If you notice - in last 2 months Miestas most of the forts took in 1 on 1 fort battles so i think i know more or less what i'm talking about. If anyone still thinks that they can take for example a big fort in 1 on 1 battle - they are always free to attack Miestas fort as many times as they want to - so i could prove you wrong or you prove me wrong and have our fort.
2. In addition of limiting fort battles this treaty takes half of the fun from fort battles. This is like both opponents would play chess with only half of their figures. Picking right forts and right times to attack is as much important as what sides do in fort battle itself. Remove this element from fort battles - and you remove half of the fun.
I think now that you have taken some forts back, you should bring Miestas on board with the treaty and then we could have some truly epic large fort battles with both sides maxed out
So what was the go with the Steeler nation fort battle? There was players from all alliances on both sides
attackers have learned superior attack skills in the area of small forts. medium to large forts however, are much more difficult.
You are awesome, but only because The Pro fights for you
(tumble)
Fort Last Stage battle - 50 attackers, 42 defenders. Most people online and pretty well coordinated. End result - 19 turns, all defenders killed, attackers lose only 19... What's up guys? Does it mean we reached the state when no towns is able to keep the fort unless attackers' tactical errors or defenders have full squad of players with pumped up fort fight skills? (tumble)