Right and wrong are morality plays that only exist in third and fourth densities.
Everything has aspects of right and wrong in them, and everythign is both good and bad.
What we have here is a 'lightsider' finding 'darkside' tactics disreputable. Does this make him right? No, of course not. It simply means he has an opposing viewpoint.
And why shouldn't he! Opposing it in philosophy is his last and only lines of defense.
Ultimately though, I consider these tactics a fair and balanced approach. In order to win, one MUST be balanced, and that means one must embrace both the dark AND the light. To help you understand this concept - I will bring up Star Wars.
"Star Wars III is amazing for several reasons. Yoda, who in all the other chapters of this series, always wants the viewer to beLIEve that Light (Jedi) is superior to Dark (Sith) and thus always wins. Well, Yoda got his ass kicked by the Dark Emperor in this film and admits that he failed. The Emperor proved to be far more powerful than Yoda and his Light masters. Anakin Skywalker, on embracing the Dark, kills a number of children (boys & girls I’m pleased to note) with his light saber. This shows a reality that is missing in 99.9% of the entertainment media that likes to show men being killed while females and children almost always escape. That is not the way of reality and it encourages false senses of security.
After I saw Yoda get his little butt kicked, I was thinking: Yoda, what about the superiority of the Light polarity? How did you get your butt kicked if you are so damned superior? Slink away to the swamps of Dagobah and learn your lesson. You would think he learned, but, as we know from the rest of the series, he did not and was still preaching Light purity as the optimum state of being.
Note in Star Wars VI that Luke defeats his father only when he incorporates the Dark with his Light (when Vader threatens Leia) creating a temporary yin-yang balance. This allowed him to beat Vader. Yet this balance was too great for this sequential Luke to hold on to for very long, so he flings his temporary Dark energy enhancement away, allowing the Emperor to almost kill him. Vader killed the Emperor only because Vader did what Luke had done in reverse: he incorporated the Light to his Dark and, hence, had his yin-yang balance that was more than the Emperor could handle. Balance ALWAYS wins because it is a mixing of both polarities. This is the most feared concept by both polarities in the Game. Neither polarity can defeat Balance, whether yin-yang balance or the far more potent true Balance.
Other interesting observations in Star Wars III include Anakin Skywalker, in his Dark vein, saying: “If you’re not with me, you’re my enemy”. Shades of American dictator George Bush’s: “Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists”! The great difference is that Anakin was truly brave while Bush is a coward who gets others to do his dirty work.
In other scenes, the Emperor uses threats thathe created to get more power. War destabilizes the republic, so he promises ‘security and peace’ by getting the legislature to grant him more power as the only way to end the war. Senator Padme (Mrs. Anakin Skywalker) correctly observes: “This is how liberty dies: with thundering applause”. The same has been happening in the United States. The majority of the people and Congress eagerly give dictator Bush and the executive branch of the government fascist powers while stripping the Constitution of its freedoms. “But you will have security and peace” is the Dark mantra to seduce the people." - The M5 Author - quoted from Matrix 5 from trufax.org
