Laup Nor
Your replies smells of some kind of god complex.
Again, you are projecting.
On an internet forum read by, um... 100 people. Fail.
Correcting spelling and grammer in stead of even faking to try and understand what is being said becomes you. Keep going. Here we are now, entertain us with your wit.
Again, projecting. It is you who fail to understand. I've replied in substance to everything of substance you have posted, and my replies have been both on point as well as more civil than your posts. You fail to answer the substantive criticisms of your behavior which I offer and instead offer a straw man argument in suggesting that I focused only on your spelling. Sitting there in plain view is my post, which shows that
your spelling wasn't even one of your 5 fails I tallied. I gave you a pass on it, since it is not relevant to the debate. But yes, I did point it out, because you did the same thing twice. (A genteel response would have been "whoops; thanks".)
So the foundation of your "OMFG go bank go bank quick quick" reason is that it is easily implemented? There are a 100 other more needed "patches" just as easily implemented. Why should yours be considered first?
It should be considered because I drew up a proposal and it received the support of the interested segment of the player community. Nobody is asking that it be considered "first" though.
Now... where's your proposal?
OH RIIIGHT. god has spoken... to his 80 odd followers on this forum.
Now you're belittling
everyone here? Your irrationality is leading you beyond silly into stupid.
I suggest some deep breaths and an actual reading of this thread, followed by an apology for being an ass. I promise to accept it.
As sojourn says, forgetting balance issues with this proposal,
...a good idea, since there are none...
there are many other ideas that would "add" more to the game and still be implemented with ease such as theTown Merchant Addition.
You'll note that I've been an active participant in that discussion and am warmly supportive of that proposal.
I second that, Luap. Your wit often keeps me entertained.
And there is your answer, Luap. The faulty logic is the assumption that voting on this idea in some way has a bearing on the progress of other ideas. They are "prioritising" an infinite set.
Good point. Another wrong assumption is that I consider this idea more important than others simply because I proposed it, or am arguing in favor of it. I don't. If someone puts up a more important idea for debate I'll be there too. But when someone calls my idea a "****ty idea" it's hardly surprising that I respond. :laugh:
FTR, I can understand someone voting no if their rationale is simply that they'd like other things to be given more priority. If that is the basis for a no vote, I'm OK with that.
Again, too, anyone is free to propose another idea, so the only thing stopping other ideas from competing here is if their champions haven't stepped into the ring. Diggo is often helpful with mockups, and we'll all pitch in to hone the idea if it's a decent one, or can be made into a decent one. So git crackin'!