Hehe, you assumed the embryo/fetus/child wants to live, or that they're even capable of choosing. You also assume, by your very statement, that a woman wants an abortion for convenience. Rather presumptuous on your part.
Fact is, a woman is alive, full capable of surviving. When pregnant, her survival (and health) is compromised. If she pursues full term, she may die, at which point so will the embryo/fetus/child.
Abortion relates to a procedure performed when the embryo/fetus is not viable, not capable of physically surviving sans uterus.
Rather obvious where the choice is, and where it should be.
YOU KNOW WHAT REALLY BOTHERS ME? IT'S THE LAW!
Federal law, backed by a Supreme Court ruling, mandates the right of choice, and yet we still have people trying to curtail and/or subjugate the law through State mandates that are repeatedly being found unconstitutional (and thus illegal), but nonetheless succeed in harming plenty of women in the interim. Indeed, there repeatedly are new mandates being throw out to make it exceedingly difficult, for facilities providing abortion, to stay above the law, like the new one imposed in Mississippi, which requires all physicians in a clinic to have access to a local hospital, despite them having a license to practice medicine in that State. This is problematic for the reason hospitals are not required to allow a doctor access to their facilities. It's also unnecessary, as any complications will be managed by emergency room staff, not the ob/gyn. And yet, what it does is pose yet one more obstacle for the only abortion clinic left standing in Mississippi. Mississippi and other States have classed it as illegal for a woman to cross into another State to obtain an abortion. In some States, it is virtually impossible to obtain an abortion precisely because of the physical threats posed by groups or individuals and legal obstacles posed by State governments..
Ultimately, neither the Federal government, nor the States, own any of us, thus laws should not infringe on travel or medical care, which is precisely what an out of State abortion constitutes.
THIS DISCUSSION ISN'T ABOUT CHOICE vs. LIFE, IT'S ABOUT WHETHER TO RESPECT THE LAW AND THE CONSTITUTION, BY ALLOWING WOMEN THE RIGHT OF CHOICE, OR TO VIOLATE THE LAW AND IGNORE THE CONSTITUTION, BY DENYING A WOMAN MEDICAL CARE AND BY FORCING HER TO GO TO FULL TERM AGAINST HER WILL.
In other words, this discussion is really about trying to justify breaking the law.