President Bush's Skills... \o/

DeletedUser

Why don't we talk about Gordon Brown's skill level. I'll start.

Gordon Brown's skill level: -276

What do you know, I found something to say about my countdown number.
 

DeletedUser

[extreme, painful sarcasm]That's obviously why he became president... [/extreme, painful sarcasm]
 

DeletedUser

He became president because the majority of American's skill in picking out a president has obviously become too low to register as well...

I'm a VERY right-wing anti-socialist. Get over it.
 

DeletedUser

I'm a VERY right-wing anti-socialist too. And Obama has less intelegence than a Llama anyday.
 

DeletedUser

lol... I don't want to be banned for what I would actually say about Obama. the F word and MF and B and other B and CS... Colorful Vocabulary :)
 

DeletedUser

lol, knowing the USSR, we might just get one for voicing our opinions on the matter...
 

DeletedUser

Well, finally we found out that Bush is good at something :D

And remember kids, DUCK!!!!
 

DeletedUser

As for Obama, he has turned C-SPAN into MTV, showing him shooting hoops and playing golf. January 20, get ready for the new, debut of C-SPAN Sports!


COMING SOON: C-SPAN Deportes!
 

DeletedUser

Virginia said:
He became president because the majority of American's skill in picking out a president has obviously become too low to register as well...

I'm a VERY right-wing anti-socialist. Get over it.
Click to expand...

Maybe so, but you desperately need my approval to be who you are.

Has your ridiculous viewpoint on politics obscured your actual sight? Because THAT was a part of my signature, not my message. And for that matter, since when is "anti-socialism" an entire political system of its own? ******s.

Don't expect me to argue with you, I find it easier to ignore or destroy despots than to try and educate them.
 

DeletedUser

I don't need anyone's approval...I've gone through enough pain to figure that out.

Agreed, anti-socialism is not a political system. I never said it was. However, it doesn't change the fact that I am an anti-socialist as well as an anti-federalist.

My comment was in sarcasm to your signature. I'm not that blind.

Don't expect me to argue with you, I find it easier to ignore or destroy despots than to try and educate them.
Click to expand...
Looks like your arguing with me to me...

(FYI: A despot is a cruel or oppressive dictator. I am the exact opposite of a despot. I believe in a loose government that has hardly any power over the states.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Granted, I am arguing with you. So I suppose I should continue to do so.

FYI (I am guessing that stands for "for your information"): A despotism is a VERY right wing government, you know, the kind you said you supported so strongly. So while you may not believe in despotism, you are not its "exact opposite", you are merely a fairly different version of radical right-winger.

However, it is interesting to finally meet someone who is at the bottom-right of the political spectrum. I suppose I would side with you over someone at the top-right, but I still disagree strongly with you. (Left and right are for left- and right-wing. Top is totalitarian; bottom is anarchist. I am at the bottom-left.)

And my comment about you needing my approval to be who you are was in sarcasm to YOUR signature. If you truly did require approval to be who you are; you would have a very difficult time existing at all.

Also, perhaps we should start a separate thread if this debate continues, to save clogging up this thread instead.
 

DeletedUser

I hate to point it out but you really cant be for both socialism and anarchism. those ideas lead in different directions.
 

DeletedUser

In fact, on the political spectrum, you have to have one economic and one governmental choice.

So you have to pick either Left-wing (Communism, Socialism, Liberalism) or Right-wing (Capitalism, Conservatism, Republicanism). That puts you in your horizontal position.

And then you pick either Anarchism or Totalitarianism. That puts you in your vertical position.

So unless you are a centrist, you have to believe in two very different systems, as one is economical and one is governmental. But I can see your point if you have never seen the spectrum.
 

DeletedUser

I wrote you back a long reply, but it didn't go through, lol..

But it's okay because you have just made it much easier...

I am a Conservative, Anarchist. Happy?

BTW: I've seen the spectrum several times. You can be a very right wing supporter and also an Anarchist. I am living proof.

No one can tell me that I am not the exact opposite of a despot. I hate dictatorship so much that I believe we should secede from the Union. In my opinion, even Barack Obama is way too much of a dictator - so that makes me even more anti-despot than you!

(There was a political thread, but it got locked...)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

I was explaining the spectrum to spudly, not to you. And in my last post to you I said that it was interesting to meet someone at the bottom right of the spectrum (ie. Conservative Anarchism). So you don't have to tell me that.

I am guessing that you voted for McCain. Millions of people did, and now they don't have the government that they want. That is why I don't think a democracy can work in a country as big as the US. So I agree, it should split into smaller countries with smaller populations.

But you cannot have both freedom of speech AND a despot. It is simply impossible. So I am going to have to disagree with you that any leader of any free country is a despot, including Obama.

And you're a lot easier to debate than David Schofield. He just yells childish insults at you and ignores whatever you say. So thank you for this argument - it is on a much more mature level than the others I have had on this forum.
 

DeletedUser

I wasn't trying to say that Obama is a despot. Saddam Hussein was a despot. I was just stating that I feel that he is too much like a dictator. One look at the new "boot camp" that he apparently is going to force all adults at a certain age to join, shows us that much.

Besides, the true reasons I am a conservative include some of the following:
I believe abortion is murder.
I believe in peace through war.
I disagree with Amendment 16 (as well as others).
I believe we should secede from the Union. (etc. You get the idea.)

And you're a lot easier to debate than David Schofield. He just yells childish insults at you and ignores whatever you say. So thank you for this argument - it is on a much more mature level than the others I have had on this forum.
Click to expand...

I appreciate that your willing to rationally debate with me, but I do have to stick up for David at least a little. You did call me a and a despot. =)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top