DeletedUser
herrings have stripes?
Neither the evolution model or the creation model can be proven scientifically. What we must do is decide which model best explains the facts that we do know.I agree with you, partially. I have, in the past, explained the erroneous conclusions presented by Creationists. The basis to their arguments, as you indicated, is on placing belief on the same footing as scientific analysis. But for "science" being grounded whilst "belief" is groundless, we find the 'created' battlefield.
We are trying to show you that your model does not fit the facts.The means to argue Creationism is to attack the theories of evolution (and yes, it is plural, not singular), rather than grounding Creationism. In other words, since Creationism cannot be grounded, instead of attempting to give 'evidence,' Creationists attempt to discredit 'evidence' that supports various aspects of differing theories in evolution.
Evolution is not fact; it is only theory. Creationism is a theory as well.Evolution is both concrete evidence (fact) and supported conclusion (theory), while Creationism is neither. There are not facts to Creationism (saying something exists does not make it so, and thus the Bible is not 'fact'), nor are there theories (because there is no evidentiary support).
Evolutionism gives Atheism respectability.However, we all know evolution is not a belief system, nor is it a religion. It is no more a religion than the broader, yet intersecting, fields of cosmology, physics, or biology. The thing is, it is easier to attack 'someone' than it is to attack 'something,' and infinitely easier than to provide scientific analysis and evidence in support of thier "feelings," i.e., beliefs.
“Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.” – Sir Arthur Keith, anthropologist
“When it comes to the origin of life on this earth, there are only two possibilities: creation or spontaneous generation (evolution). There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved one hundred years ago, but that leads us only to one other conclusion: that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds (personal reasons); therefore, we choose to believe the impossible: that life arose spontaneously by chance.” – Dr. George Wald, winner of a 1967 Nobel Prize
“It is absurd for the evolutionist to complain that it is unthinkable for an admittedly unthinkable God to make everything out of nothing and then pretend that it is more thinkable that nothing should turn itself into everything.” – G. K. Chesterton, author and Christian apologist
Creationism is a theory as well.
so you like longer posts go read a book bookwormHellstromm, could you write longer posts please?
bookworm
ok,hindus is the 3rd largest religion and mostly in India and only Hindu country Nepal,India is not Hindu country have 900million Hindu but many Muslims more than any Muslim country and 20 million christians.Many religions like Buddhism,Sikh and Jainism are founded here.Gutambudh the founder of Buddha religion take birth here and never go to china or japan to spread it.There are famous books of religion but most important is Bhagvatgita.there are also stories of Ramayana and Mahabharata 2 of most longest story in world and some part of them are read in every religious practise.most of vegetarians are Hindu and i am also pure vegetarian.there are about thousands of god in Hindus but most important are Vishnu and Shiva.there are many religious practise on almost every work such as birth,death,new vehicle,house,new job,etc.Yay! You can copy and paste. Now maybe you can explain that in your own words.
there are many religious practise on almost every work such as birth,death,new vehicle,house,new job,etc.