Yes, but the way you are using the the "fallacy" argument is not logical. Just saying "fallacy" is not a golden bullet. You have to prove the argument is a fallacy.
Geez, okay from this day forward I will spend a helluva lot of extra forum space educating you as to exactly how you pose fallacious reasoning
(flawed logic) in your various ridiculous and unsubstantiated arguments and thus, in the process, become a pawn to your intentions --- which is to derail a discussion so you don't have to bother debating the topic at hand.
No, it's not going to happen. You know, quite frankly, it's not my job to educate you on your dependencies, on your logical fallacies, on your inability to present logical arguments. I will occasionally provide you with links to sites that
you can visit so
you can educate yourself, but I will
not cater to you, will not participate in your efforts to derail a discussion.
The topic of the discussion is right there in the title of this thread, stop tangentializing like some child with ADD.
Hehe, the passages come from the same Bibles. While I do visit many sites to assist in my presentations,
these are my primary utilities regarding various renditions of the Bible --
http://www.biblegateway.com and
http://bible.cc/
"Assist" does not quite describe what you are doing. Blatantly ripping off without giving credit to the source is more close.
Umm, I quoted the Bible, various bibles, and I provided both what book of the Bible it can be found and what version of the Bible it was obtained from. Are you done being obtuse?
You do know better because the topic is
"Is it acceptable to be disrespectful to the Christian faith" and
you are the one arguing pro-disrespect." Attacking my faith and then calling me defending my faith as a Tangent and distraction...
Ahh, but that's the thing, you are
not defending the Christian faith
(your pocket version perhaps, but you have not provided substance on this avenue for me to ascertain exactly what, if anything, you're defending), you are arguing semantics and repeatedly going on tangents, like asking me to educate you on logical fallacies and debating the canonism of
"one" Bible passage.
Normally, at this point, I would run through all the previous posts and point out all the tangents, all the distractions and off-topic ramblings you presented in this thread, but I'm not going to bother this time around. If anyone else is interested, I'm sure they can entertain themselves with that.
You post a lot for some one who has rested their case.
I'm aware this comment was addressed to Tigermite, but I bet it's inconvenient for you that he continues to defend his initial assertions. Honestly, you really seem to want to get the last word in regardless of the fact you haven't added anything new to this discussion since the 3rd page.
I was not arguing for "prejudicial distinction in the treatment of different categories of people or things, esp. on the grounds of race, sex, or age."
I was saying you to be discriminating in who you associate. It seems you are the one who does not understand. I am arguing its not okay to be "disrespectful to the Christian faith." You should take a look at what side of the argument you are on before you make accusations.
I wasn't going to bother participating in your and Tiger's discussion, but seriously --- wtf?!? You're advocating segregation. Look, every day we interact and associate with people, and yes we make decisions as to the types of people we would prefer not to associate with due to their lack of manners, inappropriate comments, cleanliness, negativity, etc. But you're not arguing this. As you previously indicated, you are advocating keeping women separate from men, homosexuals separate from heterosexuals, whites separate from blacks
(oh wait, they started allowing that one in 1989, silly me). You're arguing for the reintroduction of segregation. How can you stomach that sort of stance?!?