Just to cover something in JM's signature: Sorry bud, you're not the king of controversy, only the king of ignorance. You don't even know the biblical scriptures for which you covet and incorrectly pose as argument.
You claim there are no such things as fossils, and yet such do exist. Fossils are tangible and measureable. If you wish to claim fossils do not exist, you will have to do better than claim such then holding your breath.
I would also like to point out that you "religiously" avoided responding to "any" of my disputations. Goes to show you don't have any effective arguments:
1. You still have not provided names for these so-called "evolutionists you personally spoke to.
2. You still have not provided names for these so-called "evolutionists" you allege to have indicated this or that.
3. I corrected you on your absurd notions on platypus.
4. You have thusfar failed to provide a reasonable argument as to how the platypus traveled from the Middle East to Australia.
5. You have not provided evidence to "support" your notions of Creationism.
6. You have only participated in one thing --- attack. You attack all that you perceive to be threats to your belief. Whether they be evidence, suppositions, theories, or persons, your approach is to attack, without providing even an iota of evidence.
7. You have not provided any evidence to support your claims. The bulk of your argument is "belief" and the "bible."
8. You have not responded to the arguments regarding the "fact" man wrote, rewrote, edited and disincluded writings to provide what you presently claim as the prime means of argument for your claims. I.e., the Bible.
9. When I indicated Scott Huse lied, I provided evidence to prove that he lied. By the mere fact that, on 1994, he updated his 1983 book, but did not correct his erroneous conclusions and claims on platypus, indicates he likely intended to exploit the ignorance of others. The comments he made were blatantly false, as I effectively demonstrated in my earlier posts. So yes, ultimately he did lie. Your strict adherence in contra, merely demonstrates you're a liar too.
As it is, Justin, you demonstrate gross ignorance, a denial of stated evidence, and a continued "attack as a defense, attack as argument" posturing. You've been set to the task of both providing evidence in support of your claims and in countering the evidence I have since presented. You failed to do either.
