DeletedUser8950
You don't own anything that's alive and self-aware, that's simply immoral. I don't care how powerful, if he wants to create life with free will, he can damn well not force me to worship him or obey him.Alright, you have a father, do you not DN? He would prefer you to call him your father, because he has that right, he is the only person that is rightfully your father.
God is the grand Creator of the universe, he deserves sole devotion. Does that not seem fair? He created the ground that the canaanites were squatting on, and he therefore has the right to decide can and cannot live there.
It is simple ownership, even you should be able to understand that.
If you believe you can own anyone, you're sadly mistaken. I wouldn't do anything my father says, I'd respect him, but I wouldn't live in my neighbours house because my father decided I should live.
That's assuming you believe in god anyway.
And can you respond to this post with justifications?
Can I just point out, your religion is imo leaning towards a cult in some ways. For example, friendships outside of the JW religion are discouraged based on a scripture that isn't very clear on the matter-something like "bad associates spoil good habbits," which is interpreted horribly-it's a subtle form of mind control, keeping you only with people who share your beliefs.
Moreover, more and more home education is being used. Imagine this: You've never gone to school, you're only friends are in the religion, the only teaching you've had on other religions and atheisim are derogatory-if for some small chance you do disagree with the teachings, your whole life will be in the religion.
Disfellowship as it is referred is also along these lines-don't associate with them at all, now they're not a JW they can't be your friend, and they'll try to smear you away. Only associate with them to try to lure them back in.
Anybody who expresses doubts on the leadership can be considered an apostate, even if they don't express disagreement. Raymond Franz is a famous case-ruthlessly victimized and accused as an apostate, when really he just didn't believe.
On that note, you put full trust in your "governing body," but as said above, one of it's members fell out of the beliefs and left. Surely that proves they're not infalliable, and you should question things sometimes?
On the topic of your "ministry," it's intersting. The interst isn't in people as people, but as "studies," or whatever.
It's disgusting. I know somebody who was once a member, sick in hospital, and they're trying to take advantage of that to lure them back in, though they don't care at all the rest of the time.
Moreover, as shown, your religion is Sexist and homophobic, and was originally opposed to the Suffrage movement. Gender, race, height and sexuality do not define you. Your actions do.
Also, even though you feverantly claim other religions are "false prophets," every time you've put a date on something, nothing has happened. Irony, much?
And...blood transfusions. Ouch.
Jehovah's Witnesses are willing to let children who are under age of consent die because of this. It's completely unethical.
Sure, if you yourself are willing to throw your lfie away, fine. But at that age, all they know is what they've been spoon-fed. They deserve the right to live long enough to make their own decisions on religion and such-a right you deny them. They also use false figures, distorted facts and emotional blackmail to convince people to use or let their children use blood transfusions.