DeletedUser
Oh, I mis-worded myself.
I DO NOT support abortion except for in (blah blah blah).
I DO NOT support abortion except for in (blah blah blah).
Oh, I mis-worded myself.
I DO NOT support abortion except for in (blah blah blah).
I just wanted to jump in to say I no longer support abortion... I encourage it. You see, Furryicecubes unclothed the fact a while back that many families are abusing the welfare system by having children in situations they would not normally, just to leach money. I didn't want to seem biased against the poor by encouraging this, but others are aware of Welfare problems, so I think Welfare counts should be DRASTICALLY reduced to ONLY COVERING two children. Any more that that and its on the families responsibilities to nourish them or put them up for adoption. They can't make a mistake more than twice unless they are complete morons.
I just wanted to jump in to say I no longer support abortion... I encourage it. You see, Furryicecubes unclothed the fact a while back that many families are abusing the welfare system by having children in situations they would not normally, just to leach money. I didn't want to seem biased against the poor by encouraging this, but others are aware of Welfare problems, so I think Welfare counts should be DRASTICALLY reduced to ONLY COVERING two children. Any more that that and its on the families responsibilities to nourish them or put them up for adoption. They can't make a mistake more than twice unless they are complete morons.
You know what? I truly do not like all this "welfare scum" sort of talk. People who are on welfare are not scum, nor do they deserve that sort of treatment. If you're poor, undergoing hardships, have too many kids and insufficient income, the nation helps you to ensure that you do not starve, and your children do not starve, or that you do not resort to crime and become a "real" problem for this country. Where's your damn hearts!?! Do you honestly believe these people have children so they can get another $100 out of welfare? Please learn and understand the system you criticize before you go so far as to attack the less fortunate.
Hellstromm you got to understand that the "welfare scum" that people talk about are those who live off welfare as there only means of income for 5+ years without looking for a Job (or holding a Job, because of there own doing). people who are on welfare for 3 months or so are not welfare scum.
You know what? I truly do not like all this "welfare scum" sort of talk. People who are on welfare are not scum, nor do they deserve that sort of treatment. If you're poor, undergoing hardships, have too many kids and insufficient income, the nation helps you to ensure that you do not starve, and your children do not starve, or that you do not resort to crime and become a "real" problem for this country. Where's your damn hearts!?! Do you honestly believe these people have children so they can get another $100 out of welfare? Please learn and understand the system you criticize before you go so far as to attack the less fortunate.
You know what? I truly do not like all this "welfare scum" sort of talk. People who are on welfare are not scum, nor do they deserve that sort of treatment. If you're poor, undergoing hardships, have too many kids and insufficient income, the nation helps you to ensure that you do not starve, and your children do not starve, or that you do not resort to crime and become a "real" problem for this country. Where's your damn hearts!?! Do you honestly believe these people have children so they can get another $100 out of welfare? Please learn and understand the system you criticize before you go so far as to attack the less fortunate.
I'm not saying they're scum. as one of the few people here, when I was growing up my family was on welfare when my mom lost her job in construction. but there was only one child in the family, me, not 5 or 10. I understand the system all too well
I support Welfare in general. I'm referring to the people who have child after child to keep lining their pockets, or sit on their _____ all day instead of trying to find work. That's who the "Welfare scum" are. Not the people who really do need the assistance.
Scurge, you are one example of the people who really do need it. If I had to pay taxes, I would willingly pay to help you and your family.
Wait; How could your mother have a job, yet you still be getting welfare?
Do everyone a favor and don't call them welfare scum, call them scum. Also, be full aware that these people are the very rare exception, and thus discussion of such is counterproductive, even harmful to a program that has done tremendous good and saved countless lives.
There are some good things about welfare, sure, but these "scum" are not rare, not at all. Drive down any poorly maintained street in America and you will see this "scum" everywhere.
If you look back to some of my earlier statements I agree. And along the concept of sex being controllable, the Ugandan "AIDS crisis" is their own fault as well.
To be quite honest, you're confusing poverty with "scum." You have no idea if these poor people are on welfare, nor do you know if they're exploiting the welfare system. I strongly object to your presumptions.There are some good things about welfare, sure, but these "scum" are not rare, not at all. Drive down any poorly maintained street in America and you will see this "scum" everywhere.
Are you dense or something?
How can the aids crisis be their OWN fault?!
(just to follow up on that red herring of yours)
With Patient Zero, it is not their own fault. It also isn't anybody's fault if they contracted the disease through the rubbing of non-genital open wounds.
If you know somebody has AIDS, though, and have sexual relations with them you are willingly taking the risk of contracting the disease. Even if you don't know, you are still taking the risk.
Make gambles at your own risk.