nashy19
Nashy (as himself)
Ugh, you have got to be kidding. While rocneasta was a bit harsh with his/her initial post, he/she does have a point. If you work with limited software, you obtain limited results and you cannot readily grab a template and import it from a good program into a crappy one.
Also, Word, Publisher, and PowerPoint all really suck. Seriously, they're the most dang annoying programs out there if you want to produce quality presentation work. Part of the problem is that they hide much of the format information, so you spend half your time just trying to fight the program. Better to use OpenOffice programs, although they're not much better when it comes to desktop publishing.
I have Microsoft Office 2008 but before that I used Openoffice , I found it slow and basically cheap. I expect it's to cover themselves but the way they have changed key words around randomly and swapped around toolbars/formatting is annoying, especially annoying with spreadsheet functions but we wont be using any of those.
Rocneasta was probably talking about a professional suite, but what do we need that we can't possibly work with in the average program. I'd expect a basic template, background and all graphics to be kept in the highest possible quality. Of course people doing graphics can use whatever program they like if it can handle the quality because all graphics can be incoperated into all programs. I don't think people will struggle with formatting, any professional is going to know all of the functions possible or at least they should do, programs don't do things without reason.
You don't need to have a template file, you just need a literal template image or whatever they choose. The designer should make it fit while everyone else is free to use the programs they have.
It's a newspaper layout though, it would be insanly easy to make a copy of whatever is produced in a program like word. This is all just common sense, no need to overplan.