DeletedUser
Personally, I think the camel looks just as weird. All of the odd features do have a specific purpose though, so it is a semi "intelligent" design - just not very attractive.
Daniel, it doesn't matter where they quoted the information from, as it is correct. More to the point, when you made your claim, you didn't know what the 2nd law of thermodynamics is and you still don't know what it is. That you are requesting us to educate you on the 2nd law of thermodynamics merely demonstrates you should not have used it in your argument.where does it say that earth is not an isolated system? and wikipedia is not a good source of information as any one could go edit it. i mean i could just go right now and edit it to prove my point
Yep, religion is the lazy mans way to explain things. Scientist goes true the hard work to get an answer.
If religious people had their way you still be getting the plaque and die. And the reason for it being that you had been naughty
However, going back to Pascal's wager, even if god or any higher being doesn't exist there is no harm in believing in them/him/it.
Religion gives a meaning to human life that science does not.
According to the purely scientific explanation we are just comlex structures of DNA that developed advanced brains over time-no soul, therefore there is no point in our existance.
We also have to remember that science hasn't explained everything yet. There is still a lot we don't know about evolution/genetics and the big bang, so religious explanations still have credibility.
You atheists do realize that a relatively large number of scientists are spiritual, don't you?
There is still a lot we don't know about evolution/genetics and the big bang, so religious explanations still have credibility.
You do realize spiritual isn't the same as religious don't you?
It doesn't matter whether many scientists are religious or spiritual or whatever. They'll never get a paper published when they explain their observations with gods, spirits, ghosts, lab-was-built-on-an-Indian-cemetary, elves, trolls etc.
Wikipedia is one of the most reliable sources around. Practically every article has good sources which back it up, and vandalism is almost always removed within minutes.Wikipedia is not a good source of information as any one could go edit it. i mean i could just go right now and edit it to prove my point
That doesn't necessarily mean that they are CrazyChristians.You atheists do realize that a relatively large number of scientists are spiritual, don't you?