DeletedUser
This is a simple opinionated discussion, not reserved to or limited to anything but what your own opinion is of what happens when you *pass away*, or *Die*.
We become what we were before we were born.
We came from the vast nothingness of non-existence and to that place we return.
There is something. This something is nothing.But there has to be something.
Yet we are so similar when you examine our DNA.How is it that we're so different compared to all the other animals on this planet?
Evolution.How is it that we can build skyscrapers, pyramids, put ourselves on other planets, all while other animals can't even manage to solve a mathmatical equation?
So it seems to plenty, but we've been over that countless times.It seems like we were created for a higher purpose than other animals, so to say that we will have nothing to await us when we die does not seem rewarding enough for our species, a species that has surpassed all other living creatures on this planet and very well much our universe.
There is no maker to return to, no heaven, no hell. No masters, no slaves.I really think that something awaits us when we die. Weather it be ourselves being enveloped into the memories of other, as Hellstromm seems to believe, or going to a place of paradise and glory with our maker.
There is something. This something is nothing.
Why does there have to be anything more?
We, me, you, and everyone we know are biological.
When we die we decompose and the essence that was us will be gone.
Some indian tribe somewhere believe that one does not truly die until the influence one has had on the world ceases to be.
Much akin to a rock thrown into the water. The rock landing is your life, the ripples in the water what follows. Much like what Hellstromm described, and I share that view.
Ultimately though even the ripples cease.
Yet we (animals) are so similar when you examine our DNA.
Evolution.
So it seems to plenty, but we've been over that countless times.
Why do you feel as if you are entitled to something more simply for being born?
Isn't this amazing gift that is life awe-inspiring enough?
There is no maker to return to, no heaven, no hell. No masters, no slaves.
Only men.
Nothingness awaits, and viewing this life as a test of your worthiness of the next is to throw away and diminish this amazing experience that is life.
Umm, ttr, evolution doesn't follow one path. In the case of man vs apes, all of which came from the same genetic strain, the difference, the factor that allowed Man to be significantly more intelligent than our tool-using ape counterparts was, surprisingly, our jawbone. The skull is comprised of interconnecting bone plates. The muscles that hold those bones together are the jaw muscles. It is the brain cavity, the area inside the skull, that determines how large the brain can grow. Research confirmed the greater the proportional brain mass in apes, the proportionally weaker the jaw. This is because the muscles that control the jaw are also the muscles that keep the skull's bone plates from expanding, and thus preventing the brain from growing.Lol. So you're saying that other animals evolve like we do? So sharks that have been around for millions of years, are ultimately smarter than us and secretly have underwater cities that we cant see?
No, not really. Religions, for the most part, are deity-centric. Philosophical approaches to life, on the other hand, some tend to approach this, others do not. As to prayer, again that is deity-centric. You're confusing actions with occurrences. Remembering is an occurrence. It happens regardless of your intent. It is the nature and the manner of how our brains work, capturing data through replication. Us remembering someone is not an act of prayer, it is an occurrence within your brain. Praying for the departed is merely a conduit-like physical act connecting memory with deity-centric belief.Isn't that what most religious views say as well? That we should impact others in our life for the good before we die, in order to achieve peace in the afterlife. What you're saying, if I'm correct, is that by affecting others in you're life you will live on through their memories.
Um, no. Actually plants are far more complex, genetically. You are mis-equating intelligence to evolution. If you put a man in the water with a hungry shark, the shark will demonstrate itself to be far more advanced, in the water, as a predator. If the best foliage available is the leaves of tall trees, the giraffe would demonstrate itself to be more advanced in obtaining this foliage. Penguins pwn when it comes to Antarctica, lizards rock when it comes to deserts.What I stated is that us as a species are much more advanced than anything currently on our planet.
How do you know you have a human soul? Because you say so? Because you think you do? How do you know a dog doesn't have a soul? Because you say so? Because you think they don't? Where's the evidence supporting your assumptions? Right, there is none, because it's a want, a belief, not evidentiary, not verifiable. In other words, fantasy.Us as a species deserve something when we die. We have a human soul, we don't just rely on instinct. ... This seperates us from other animals in a unique way, and because of that I really do think that we will get something after we die, just from being born.
Exactly, you played the game so well, so where's your damn kewpie doll!But thinking of life as a test is a great way to extend this amazing experience. ... if we stive to be good in our life, to help others, cheer on others and make them happy, to create and not destroy, to achieve common good for other humans, all for trying to achieve paridise, we will make our experience of life great.
Well, yeah, that's the general idea behind the search for immortality. But again, history only lasts until it's forgotten. And who and what we were are lost as well. The great idea behind such attempts at immortality has one unfortunate and unassailable obstacle --- we die.we will be remembered throughout history as a great human being.
Hellstromm;524174. It is the brain cavity said:soo if im following you corectly your saying a larger brain makes a smarter mammal correct ?
because this is complete fallacy even in man
one its been proven that teh smartest humans that have ever lived often had smaller than normal brains
then theres animals like elephants who have significantly larger brains than us but while smart are no where near as smart as us
brain size has 0 direct corrilation to intelligence
No, it has not been proven. There you go making things up again. You really should see a doctor about that problem.one its been proven that teh smartest humans that have ever lived often had smaller than normal brains
Obviously you weren't following me at all. Creating a straw man argument seems to be your bread and butter.soo if im following you corectly your saying a larger brain makes a smarter mammal correct ? because this is complete fallacy even in man
Evolution.