DeletedUser
I'm sure you all know about the Leveson Inquiry and the subsequent Leveson Report.
Personally, I take the view that an independent regulator is needless, the incidents that caused the inquiry in the first place are covered by law, the law was broken, and thus the perpetrators should be prosecuted. End of story.
So what's everyone else's view on this?
Personally, I take the view that an independent regulator is needless, the incidents that caused the inquiry in the first place are covered by law, the law was broken, and thus the perpetrators should be prosecuted. End of story.
So what's everyone else's view on this?