Fort Battles

Status
Not open for further replies.

DeletedUser

DSG said:
The so loved by all [sarcasm]resistance[/sarcasm] started taking forts from neutral towns now? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Like you care about "neutral" town forts. You dont go to defend even your own little allies forts.

There are only two sides in this world - pro tw on anti tw. If someone has a fort and dont have much strength it is most likely pro tw (one of those peeing on themselves ppl), who come to tw side and then dont understand why they are being attacked and why there is noone to defend when they need it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mi35

Well-Known Member
lokiju said:
Like you care about "neutral" town forts. You dont go to defend even your own little allies forts.

There are only two sides in this world - pro tw on anti tw. If someone has a fort and dont have much strength it is most likely pro tw (one of those peeing on themselves ppl), who come to tw side and then dont understand why they are being attacked and why there is noone to defend when they need it.
Click to expand...

Seems me you have short memory, lokiju. Not all forts attacked by you or your allies were against you. :nowink:
Although the definition "with us or against us" doesn't give many chances to oppose anything you said. Simplification.
 

DeletedUser

mi35 said:
Seems me you have short memory, lokiju. Not all forts attacked by you or your allies were against you. :nowink:
Although the definition "with us or against us" doesn't give many chances to oppose anything you said. Simplification.
Click to expand...

Could you refresh my memory please? As i dont remember any fort attacked who wasnt on tw's side.

As of dividing people/towns/alliances - i divide only "with TW or not". And yes - its very simple. As TW is/was controlling 80% of forts its has to be. If you come to aid TW - for me it means that you are on their side :)

As i understand you have more "complex" view. Care to share?
 

DeletedUser

lokiju said:
Well... thats what i'm proud of:

Battle for Southern Cross
44 fighters have attacked the Fort. 42 defenders defended.
34 attackers fell. 42 defenders fell.

Nicely done people! :)
Click to expand...

very good battle, i saw most of the people on the other side were -TW- as usual,:dry: as they turn up at every fort miesteas or any resistance town attacks/ defends they are really trying to crush the oppostion
 

DeletedUser41

tom paris said:
very good battle, i saw most of the people on the other side were -TW- as usual,:dry: as they turn up at every fort miesteas or any resistance town attacks/ defends they are really trying to crush the oppostion
Click to expand...

Just as everyone else turns up against -TW- battles??? And you kind of contradict what lokiju just said about -TW- not defending/caring about "neutral forts".

If it was mostly defended by -TW-, surely one of you are talking out of your arse. I will let you quibble over who gets the honour :) Lets face it, you are no longer or never have bee the "resistance", its just a nice tag to try and make you look like the good guys.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

realm of deceit said:
Just as everyone else turns up against -TW- battles??? And you kind of contradict what lokiju just said about -TW- not defending/caring about "neutral forts".

If it was mostly defended by -TW-, surely one of you are talking out of your arse. I will let you quibble over who gets the honour :) Lets face it, you are no longer or never have bee the "resistance", its just a nice tag to try and make you look like the good guys.
Click to expand...

im not really one to say or decide what happens between the resistance and -TW-,
also i didn't read lokiju's post, i must have missed it :) by mistake
 

DeletedUser14029

realm of deceit:
how rude of you. I was just trying to make the game more fun in a sense of two opposing camps. and obviously the side I am on are the good guys, isn't it ^^
 

mi35

Well-Known Member
lokiju said:
Could you refresh my memory please? As i dont remember any fort attacked who wasnt on tw's side.
Click to expand...
Yes, for example, G2 both forts taken not so long ago. What's most interesting - one of them have reports been attacked by both of 2 "big bro's" :) (Really don't know what those guys managed to take wrath of both sides)

lokiju said:
As of dividing people/towns/alliances - i divide only "with TW or not". And yes - its very simple. As TW is/was controlling 80% of forts its has to be. If you come to aid TW - for me it means that you are on their side :)
Click to expand...
As simple as that there are(were?) randoms which participates in any battles, regardless of ownership (including myself). Don't you remember it too? :rolleyes:

lokiju said:
As i understand you have more "complex" view. Care to share?
Click to expand...
Every not one-sided county has it's own history. I may speak from the point of view what I was part of - one exact counties' alliance. Too sad - it ended by the same reason you lost the big forts (that county were one in which you had big fort)... (tumble)
Yes, lokiju, it's more complex when you have many independent towns of 5...15 members opposed to cluster of 10 towns "of the same rules and leadership" (am I correct quoting Miestas profile? if not, please, correct me).
 

DeletedUser

mi35 said:
Yes, for example, G2 both forts taken not so long ago. What's most interesting - one of them have reports been attacked by both of 2 "big bro's" :) (Really don't know what those guys managed to take wrath of both sides)
Click to expand...

Trust me there was a good reason fort that. We didnt attack it out of the blue after we defended it before.


As simple as that there are(were?) randoms which participates in any battles, regardless of ownership (including myself). Don't you remember it too? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
There are participants like you, but they own no fort usually, so they are free to do so. If they'd own a fort - they'd need to worry on how to defend it in case of an attack (if they dont have enough ppl themselves) and here comes in picture their decision - pro tw or anti tw.


Yes, lokiju, it's more complex when you have many independent towns of 5...15 members opposed to cluster of 10 towns "of the same rules and leadership" (am I correct quoting Miestas profile? if not, please, correct me).
Click to expand...
Sorry but i still do not understand how it makes more complex then "you are with tw or against them". TW/SB/WP/IC and many others on their side have many towns spread over the sectors and they fit well in a simple view. If some towns are inactive or have poor leadership - its another problem - not complexity of diplomatic relationships in our world.
If you own forts and dont have people to defend it by yourself - you have to choose sides or will loose it. Its simple as that. You can either fight with tw or against them.
 

DeletedUser14006

tom paris said:
i agree with the last line lokiu you have to choose, i did :)
Click to expand...

o6mjba.jpg
 

mi35

Well-Known Member
lokiju said:
There are participants like you, but they own no fort usually, so they are free to do so. If they'd own a fort - they'd need to worry on how to defend it in case of an attack (if they dont have enough ppl themselves) and here comes in picture their decision - pro tw or anti tw.
Click to expand...

All my fort battle medals I got being owner of fort, at fact. And that didn't force me choose one side over another. But if you, lokiju, want to see only your picture of 2 alliances in this world, that's your choice, bragg it on.
The charm of independent "non-big-alliance" interest is one what this game have lost. But I like an idea Independence county had formulated. I'd like more counties going similar way.
 
Last edited:

DeletedUser

-TW- Mani fort is down

49 fighters have attacked the Fort. 37 defenders defended.
15 attackers fell. 37 defenders fell.

Very good job to lokiju

this is a really big thing to come from a multi wave attack and i think -tw- weren't expecting this, the resistance is resisting more than ever
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top