DeletedUser
Is it just me or are the following statements completely at odds with each other:
In the first post you justify yourself by playing the aggrieved party card and in the second you state that you will happily attack if a fort has no NAP with you.
You guys make me laugh, you set yourself up as paragons of virtue but in reality you are more flawed and self serving than the rest of the world added together.
Man up and own up that you started out with good intentions but all you do now is false flag in order to further your aims. Should you grow a big enough pair to admit that then you will find the vast majority of this world will stop viewing you with the disdain and suspicion that you currently enjoy.
Forts are made to be taken over.
Anyway, the -CA- alliance attacked The Alamo which was established by -FoM- Mexico.
Why do you expect that dusty along with the rest of the FoM would stay aside and just look?
Bk200's fort or better said Corleone family's fort was attacked cuz Corleone family isn't allied or in a NAP with the FoM.
In the first post you justify yourself by playing the aggrieved party card and in the second you state that you will happily attack if a fort has no NAP with you.
You guys make me laugh, you set yourself up as paragons of virtue but in reality you are more flawed and self serving than the rest of the world added together.
Man up and own up that you started out with good intentions but all you do now is false flag in order to further your aims. Should you grow a big enough pair to admit that then you will find the vast majority of this world will stop viewing you with the disdain and suspicion that you currently enjoy.