Call Of Duty Vs Medal Of Honor

  • Thread starter Jim PlunderSilver
  • Start date

DeletedUser

Cragsterboy said:
COD is better due to its campaign, its stays with a squad and is believe able where as MH you have a squad for like the first 3 missions and then you become like a secret agent spy guy which i find annoying and boring after a while, it happens in every game MH has produced.
Click to expand...
True, the squad system needs more work, but COD mp needs a overhaul. it just gets boring. the MoH mp has actual objectives which make this vital for you to play good and ambush em which i find entertaining. tho Moh:Ab sucked real bad.
 

DeletedUser

I still play MOHAA on the computer, and am still in a clan for the game lol (how lame is that)
but as far as computer games go i prefer the Medal Of Honor games

But for PS3 I prefer the Call Of Duty series, especially World at War........

and after lvl 65 you start with prestige who ever said thats it
 

DeletedUser

right call of duty has sold more. firstly try playing cod2 theres no ranks it just fun with the modes like zombies , ctf ,sd , tdm ,dm , retrival and jump lol, zombies on any call of duty is fun try call of duty uo and 4 for zombies u will be stuck on it lol
 

DeletedUser

Medal Of Honour Is Better Coz Call Of Duty:
1. Is The Least Historically Accurate Game EVER
2. Makes you shoot 9 Meters From where you aim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top