its clear that you didnt realy read anything that i posted other than a few clips for you o respond to in a hostile mannor
the entire point of everything i said IF you accualy tookt eh time to read it which you didnt was that it needs to be done in a carefull maner but that IT NEEDS to be done
before you start alling people homophobic you darn wel better know who your talking to as nearly half of my friends are eitehr gay or bisexual and ALL of them beleive that while dadt needs to go it needs to be done right
I did read your post and actually responded to each point you made.
DADT should end but it shouldnt end by a juges orders a jude doesnt have the authority to make a change in a congressional order on military policy and it sets a dangerous precident
You were wrong as I previously stated, the judge does have the authority.
The ones having the problem with this change are not the majority of the military but the few homophobics, just like in our civilian society.
And no one called you homophobic ^^. I clearly stated that ones having a problem with the change are.
You claim you don't have a problem with DADT ending, just how it ends. So now that clearly doesn't refer to you does it?
As far as "ALL" of your bisexual and gay friends go they are a minority.
Those I know
just want it ended and don't care how it happens.
However if it was prioritized I think they would tell you their choices would be in descending order:
1. For the Senators and Congressman who supposedly represent the citizens of this country to show a few guts and vote to end it demonstrating that they think those who are gay are citizens entitled to the same rights as any other citizen.
But as demonstrated last week thats not going to happen. Senators and Congressman are going to pander to their constituents in their districts and push agendas that will gather them votes...ie...
Promising to over turn the adoption laws in Florida so that gays can't adopt, can't get married, can't collect government benefits or get tax breaks just like any other married couple. In fact many are pushing an agenda now that anyone who is gay or lesbian should not even be able to teach school or have any other career working with children.
To make sure no one slips through the crack their agenda has expanded to where they don't even want anyone who is single to be able to teach school "just in case."
2. For President Obama to keep his campaign promises and end it.
However since our elected representatives passed a law preventing the President of the United States from being able to end DADT by Executive order it is highly unlikely that Obama is going to take the position that law violates the separation of power as laid out in the constitution and do it anyhow and take him to court if they don't like it.
That leaves him trying to work it through the Congress and Senate with the problems as outlined in #1 above.
3. For the courts to end it.
Which at this time they are in the process of doing. The consensus of the courts are changing to where not only DADT is unconstitutional, but so is the Defense of Marriage ACt.
But like I said, bottom line, the gays I know want it ended
one way or the other and whatever it takes to do so works for them...
just so it happens.