DeletedUser
I followed up that link, and I'm sorry to say that it's scientifically illiterate.I.e., he and Willy would prefer to argue from a podium of ignorance instead of becoming informed, educated on evolutionary facts and theories.
Don't lump me together with Sum on that one, I am very well educated on that subject as well as others.
As far as your evidence is concerned,
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/tj/v14/n1/fossil
there are conflicting ideas on that front, not really proof as you would have others believe.
The very first sentences say:-
"The reality of the geologic column is predicated on the belief that fossils have restricted ranges in rock strata. In actuality, as more and more fossils are found, the ranges of fossils keep increasing."
Well of course, as you get more datapoints the total range increases. Only if the first 2 are the most extreme you will ever observe will this not be the case. Why take a truism and present it as a counter-argument? I forced myself to read on but it did not get much better. Just as one example, this guy seems to think that Noah's flood arranged all the fossils in their observed order without even attempting any explanation of how or why turbulent water flow could sift them into their correct evolutionary order. It's pure voodoo "science".
Well of course, as you get more datapoints the total range increases. Only if the first 2 are the most extreme you will ever observe will this not be the case. Why take a truism and present it as a counter-argument? I forced myself to read on but it did not get much better. Just as one example, this guy seems to think that Noah's flood arranged all the fossils in their observed order without even attempting any explanation of how or why turbulent water flow could sift them into their correct evolutionary order. It's pure voodoo "science".
Last edited by a moderator: