DeletedUser
1. Oisinallen 2. Elmyr 3. Jack Beauregard
Virginia said:Allen, how am I offending you. I'm just stating my beliefs, just as you and the other's are. One woman against three guys, and yet I am the offending one.
Oisinallen said:I know there are three of us. I simply didn't realize that 3 people = offensive.
You just found yourself a new prejudice!
Is it racist that I hate Osama Bin Laden? Is it age-ist that I hate Robert Mugabe?It's better than your prejudice: one woman = offensive.
I said that Virginia offended me, so she said:
"How can I be offensive when there are three of you?"
So I got a little confused, and tried to make sense of her ramblings.
It's not funny if oyu have to explain it.
Wich I do belive has been mentioned previously.
You're my new favourite forumer!Well maybe you are like god, jesus and the holy ghost? 3 but 1. You are awesome Oisin...you should take that show to Las Vegas. Now that's what I call evolution.
Virginia said:The Law of Cause-and-Effect:
“No effect is ever greater nor qualitatively superior to its cause. An effect can be lower than its cause but never higher.”
The First Law of Thermodynamics:
“Energy can be converted from one form into another, but can neither be created nor destroyed.”
It therefore teaches quite conclusively that the universe did not create itself; there is nothing in the present structure of natural law that could possibly account for its own origin. However, energy must have been created someway because it exists. The Law of Cause-and-Effect clearly shows that universe could not have been its own cause.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics:
“Every system left to its own devices always tends to move from order to disorder.”
This law clearly requires the universe to have has a beginning. The previous laws prelude it having begun itself. The only possible reconciliation of this problem is that the universe was created by a Cause transcendent to itself. It’s obvious by definition that neither the big-bang theory nor the steady-state theory has any observational basis. In fact, they contradict both Laws of Thermodynamics. This is just another reason why they are philosophical speculations, not science, secondary assumptions to avoid the contradictions implicit in the evolutionary model.
Whether or not you prefer to believe in God, you must still belive in some kind of uncaused first cause. You must either postulate matter coming into existence out of nothing or else matter itself becomes its own cause, and then I may ask: "But, then, who made matter?" In either case, therfore, one must simply believe in eternal, omnipotent matter or else in an eternal, omnipotent Creator God. However, if matter created everything, then we are back to the law of cause-and-effect. It just doesn't work.