Feedback 2024 Awesomia Battle Initiative - Feedback

GrandDuke

Member
just to add on, some players did ask inno to EXPLAIN the pop up survey about join restrictions prior to doing the survey when players logged into each world. Unfortunately, inno only communicated in this forum about what it meant to have join restrictions in awesomia and what goal was. So many players verbally stated what is this and asked how to vote. There was about 3 worlds at time that did have join restrictions where inno local "fort "balance" specialists" did alter sides and restrictions but was about 95% time even worse then had been before, so know those that experienced that were communicating to others vote no inno fort "balance" speacilists in worlds.

Not saying right or wrong, but do know that few of us was asking inno to be more clear of what the vote was for prior to actual vote. Never happened.

No offense to inno fort battle specialists, i also voted no to join restrictions based on memory of what was done in colo year ago, changes every day, was so difficult on that world. Happy to see it come back a bit.
I am quite new player, so when last survey happened I voted "NO" to Join restrictions. Because I thought it would be fun to play without restrictions. I thought it means that we will have 300 vs 400 players battles LOL :D
 

PrancingPurplePony

Well-Known Member
Add Dakota to not getting an Awesomia battle on the 28th.
Also while there was an Awesomia battle in Arizona on the 27th, it does not look like it was a GM battle
Has the fort battle strategist team all fallen ill, or too busy with the event world?
 

martoru

Well-Known Member
on Kansas on April 28th at 20:40 ST
on Idaho on April 28th at 21:20 ST
on Dakota on April 28th at 21:40 ST
on Fairbank on April 28th at 22:00 ST
on Montana on April 28th at 22:20 ST
on Briscoe on April 28th at 22:40 ST

Soo they forgot to dig all these?
it is so hard to admit but i regret syntex
 

mnnielsen

The West Team
Community Manager
We have been down with sickness and a part of the team have been busy with the IFBC, hopefully we will soon be back on track with the scheduled fights
 

martoru

Well-Known Member
quote:
"
Hello everyone!

With the new Version 2.221 introduced on April 30th certain fort battle updates were made. The ability as a leader to retarget offline players once in battle.

To offer everyone a sample of how this operates we are running a set of "Sheriff John" battles (no bonus rewards).
In these battles GM characters will pop up in the battle chats from time to time looking to recruit a leader. That leader will be given a premium rank they may use as they see fit.
We hope that each leader selected will commit to being online for the battle and exercise the option to redirect offliners at an opportune point in the battle."


i would like to see each one of you, fort battle strategist lead one round of awsomias , to lead from exmple
and we players will see why you choose to fill strategist position
 

Jordy

The West Team
Fort Balancing Strategist
Forum moderator
quote:
"
Hello everyone!

With the new Version 2.221 introduced on April 30th certain fort battle updates were made. The ability as a leader to retarget offline players once in battle.

To offer everyone a sample of how this operates we are running a set of "Sheriff John" battles (no bonus rewards).
In these battles GM characters will pop up in the battle chats from time to time looking to recruit a leader. That leader will be given a premium rank they may use as they see fit.
We hope that each leader selected will commit to being online for the battle and exercise the option to redirect offliners at an opportune point in the battle."


i would like to see each one of you, fort battle strategist lead one round of awsomias , to lead from exmple
and we players will see why you choose to fill strategist position
Feel free to watch this Awesomia Replay of March 20th Colorado where I led the attack. Attack 1.129.550 Vs Defense 1.648.726 HP.
Attack won

You were in Defense mate. :'P
 

Clever Hans

Well-Known Member
quote:
"
Hello everyone!

With the new Version 2.221 introduced on April 30th certain fort battle updates were made. The ability as a leader to retarget offline players once in battle.

To offer everyone a sample of how this operates we are running a set of "Sheriff John" battles (no bonus rewards).
In these battles GM characters will pop up in the battle chats from time to time looking to recruit a leader. That leader will be given a premium rank they may use as they see fit.
We hope that each leader selected will commit to being online for the battle and exercise the option to redirect offliners at an opportune point in the battle."


i would like to see each one of you, fort battle strategist lead one round of awsomias , to lead from exmple
and we players will see why you choose to fill strategist position
On some worlds these Awesomia fights were so unbalanced that battles ended in less than 10 rounds.
Not a real chance to test this new feature, right?
 

Goober Pyle

The West Team
Fort Balancing Strategist
On some words these Awesomia fights were so unbalanced that battles ended in less than 10 rounds.
Not a real chance to test this new feature, right?
I wasn't a test, just a technology demonstration -- a chance for players to see it in action.

a replay of the colorado battle shows some of the potential -- it is obvious exactly when Attack deployed it, and where they sent them, and the impact it can have on a battle.
 

Clever Hans

Well-Known Member
I wasn't a test, just a technology demonstration -- a chance for players to see it in action.

a replay of the colorado battle shows some of the potential -- it is obvious exactly when Attack deployed it, and where they sent them, and the impact it can have on a battle.
Then could have organised it just for Colorado. For other worlds it was more or less just a WASTE OF TIME and buffs, especially since there were no special rewards included.
 
Top