I'm one of those people who doesn't believe the WHO 90% of the time.
They're 9/10 political, 1/10 scientific. :|
Also, we need to look at the definition of "obese." BMI is generally a measure for obesity, but BMI is an inherently flawed system. I, myself, am 6'3", 240 lbs. A great deal of my weight is muscle, but my BMI classifies me as being "Obese." My doctor told me to ignore that, saying, "well, BMI isn't always accurate." If it's not
always accurate, how can you simply
assume it ever
is accurate?
Also, how are peoples' BMI's/weights/heights/etc. being recorded? I feel like such information is impossible to gather with any accuracy. I have friends who haven't been to the doctor in years. In poor countries, it's routine for people to go decades without seeing a physician. So... how is the WHO telling us how many fat people any given country has in it? Take your cross-sections and sample-groups, but that's not "fact," that estimation. Maybe there's an entire town of fat or slender people that slipped under your sampling radar...
Additionally, when I think "obese," I think "FAT," not "a little tubby" or "thick." Once you start measuring anyone who is a little overweight as being "obese" (based on a flawed formula), the entire notion of "the most obese nation" falls apart. Not only that, but has anyone asked themselves what BMI does to women? I rarely hear it being cited in discussions about eating disorders or physical normalizing.
Just wanted to get it all out there.