said during discussion: actually its unclear why galv which has had about 30 battles (50-60 players) plus awesomia battles in last 2 months vs some other worlds (briscoe, el dor, or drama idaho) where only few battles other then Awesomia, seems they were getting more activity and ones named. In Houston, there was recent discussion of reorganizing whole world and redistributing forts but apparently no input or survey from either galv or houston of this info. It appears those pushing to close worlds for own reasons was inno input? - if was 4 or 5 worlds (b,d,e,g,h,i) would make better sense but meh .. its inno. Its too bad but hopefully will have some silver linings (some will leave, some will remain and can see what can be done after. For life of me moving toon to less active world seems odd. So guess left wih why galv houston, and not others? and couldnt we have bit more heads up if this was in works? If it is about numbers and money .. then that is good thing to communicate as stops questioning inno as people get that. but then leads to why keep open with associated costs but encourage players to leave? talk to us
I admit bit eye opening with timing as kinda squashes other players recent efforts and ultimately their future efforts (not so much me, i was one saying watch it sky falling sky falling that there are some that will try to stop efforts to bring back ff's .. it falled afterall!!) and at same time as announcement some stupid stuff in idaho that some feel is mismanaged by inno - ofc cant speak to it but know players begging for legit reasons to move toons that if you can migrate players about, perhaps consider being proactive about that too. Know would be much appreciated. People want to just play game AND have least impact on thier fellow players.
Also recalling decisions about migrations years ago - migrating 14 year toons from W1 who were rallied up and pitted against team in 4 year old worlds did impact batles, (10yrs more skill points is big, in small worlds) and players left to tough out. Ofc thought great many w1 players went to older worlds where levels were bit close (AZ, etc)r.. Seems better move to older, not newer and would like to see more then 3 options for galv and houson for players
Having said that, i agree with above post (hasha post)l. we really should only have about 5 or so running worlds and formally close others. Yes, those in multiple worlds will have to chose and give up some toons but combining all to one new word (even replacing the new world in oct) will bring life. but end of day ALL players expect fairness, safe, fun to be informed gaming experience and want active worlds.
