I actually said I found the idea interesting and ask a couple of questions about what I saw as a couple of problem areas or flaws.indeed, everyone gets their hpback at the end, so theres no loss for any players as such
looks like some are scared to lose their pride?
a town crushes another, so what? alliances crush other alliances in fort wars, that doesnt seem to bother you considering how many times you both have flamed any attempts at ideas correcting this issu WITHOUT bringing any ideas to the table yourselves.
so a town beats another in dueling, i think what is left to discuss is what is won and what is lost?
i quite like the using enemy forts idea as a reward, that way a dueling town can aso get the advantages of forts too, this would most likely help in evening out the fort fight playing field?
i think that there should be some kind of dueling advantage for the winner and a dueling disadvantage for the loser.
That is not flaming.
But apparently you seem to think it is ok for some maxed out town with maxed out top duelers to be able to go beat on some town 1/3rd their size composed mainly of workers and adventurers with a few low level duelers and massacre them and consider that a "dueling war" entitled to rewards to possible include the loss of their fort.
I disagree with that approach.