Real Recommended World!

RaiderTr

Well-Known Member
Sadly you have many wrong points/lack of infos but it's taking too long to answer all that and it's pointless.
So let's agree to disagree.

Though, idk who even said this topic was for "newbies" and for newbies alone?!
Like we really have any/many newbies, let alone visiting Forum.
 

Darkuletzz

Member
Colorado its the World to play, maybe Arizona too, all the dead world like Juarez and Idaho , now are buried to the ground, Idaho its 30 vs 30 at FF, possible at the end of this year will be 15 vs 15. Juarez can not fill a medium fort and in 1 year will become just like Idaho.
And Kansas, well players like to play below 30 rounds at every fort battle and the amount of nuggets that was spent in Kansas was atrocious :-)) , anyway Kansas have his own grave starting with October 2021.
 

Johnny the Death

Well-Known Member
amazing how people can judge fights without knowing there are multis XD

I do not agree that these judgement are accurate enough to convince people to join Colorado
 

Darkuletzz

Member
^ Well you can play the death world juarez :) , and finish every battle in 25 rounds :D, and if you said again " I dont care", maybe you should not play that tought boy in Juarez, you just play there because in every world you are just a regular player, a nobody :D
 

lulumcnoob

Well-Known Member
you just play there because in every world you are just a regular player, a nobody :D
I'm sorry, who are you?

Yes, new worlds are terrible (I could write this entire post on why these low quality, often multi battles are not fun, but we all know that already), and they're going to die in less than a year, so it's never a long-term thing when you join up. As long as players know this is the situation, it's mostly fine... We obviously see how much players spend on these worlds in the opening months to get that massive premium advantage, at the expense of the actual content of this game - the free to play playerbase. I still think a re-setting speed world would be much more enjoyable for everyone, in place of new worlds that kill off the last one, and would still make plenty of money - more money if it's a challenge run. Giving a world a purpose would be game changing.
A lot of people tried really hard to make Idaho the world that broke the mould (I can't speak for Huston, Juarez or Kansas politics) - but everyone can see for themselves how that ended up. I know people want new worlds and new challenges, but the truth is, short of merging all game servers into one, we don't have the playerbase to support it anymore, nor a management that cares to help the situation.

This company used to take pro-active action to ensure the continuity of the gameplay, what the hell changed?

If you have the time and motivation to spam 15s jobs all day, and connections for free gear, then starting on Colorado, or one of the old stable worlds, is the best long-term decision you'll ever make in this game. But if you don't have all three of these things, like me, then it's a looooooooooooong wait for migrations just to be allowed to play the game we love again (and buy nuggets!). I do hope that @kuro90 is still asking for migration routes for the community out of dead worlds at every available opportunity.
It's apparently often forgotten by the game masters that this is, in fact, a PvP game, with supporting PvE elements. Not a casino, not a digital chores simulator, and definitely not Pokémon where you gotta collect em all, but for collector cards that don't give you anything. I'm sad that all I can do to push back against this terrible new direction is rant on a forum that no one important to these decisions will ever read.
 
Last edited:

RaiderTr

Well-Known Member
I do not agree that these judgement are accurate enough to convince people to join Colorado
And I do not agree that "there are multies" is enough to convince to people to NOT join.
Because multies are everywhere.

That's said.. the better decision would be to NOT play the game at all, but yea.
 

drphil3

New Member
colorado has a mildly dramatic history, a few annoying past events (what server hasn't?), but overall putting them aside it's an okay server. as long as players are given the space to play as they like without some older players pestering them too much.

.........they know who they are ^^

and just on a side note, i have yet to grasp the appeal of anyone discouraging others in a forum, if they for whatever reason dislike a game or the concept of the gaming community. just because YOU don't like it, doesn't mean anyone else has to agree with you, or with me

what, Gordon Ramsey went off the air?
 
Last edited: