The goal of Anarchists is decentralised and self-regulating society (note the word "regulating"), not disorder. I don't really care if you agree with that goal or not, but if you want to argue against particular political ideas, you need to argue against the actual ideas. And for that, you need to know what those ideas actually are.
I ask this question in all honesty:
If you think that "the goal of Anarchists is decentralised and self-regulating society," why don't you promote direct democracy?