New World In October ?

Tanzstafe

Tanzstafe

Banned
Thanatoss said:
Relax relax :lol:

Yes I play on colorado too itst nice and I abandoned my non net market because new worlds get less than 20 active players there. Most non net servers are dead this is widely known.
On a 10+++ year old world you are going to count the 150+ level players to see how big the server is and you can get 150lvl in 6 months.
Also if you want to be competitive you are not going to start on an old world but you will choose a new one. And you can always keep playing on colorado too you don't have to be on one server only.
Click to expand...
"

[09:04] Raynor337: 1000 times better here
[09:05] Raynor337: besides having support, there is not so much toxic here
[09:05] Tanzstafe: proceed
[09:05] Raynor337: lots of experienced players to exchange ideas and builds
[09:06] Raynor337: besides always having full FF
[09:06] Tanzstafe: any negative points?
[09:06] Tanzstafe: besides having given time and money in a bankrupt world
[09:06] Raynor337: Never reach the top 1 probably lol
[09:07] Raynor337: the fact of the quantity of nuggeters and mammoths is the only negative point
[09:08] Tanzstafe: Still, are you willing to face this here rather than any misfortune that happens in Brazil?
[09:08] Raynor337: yes, br has tendeiro20
[09:09] Raynor337: the biggest #@!$ I've ever met
"
 

sanidh

Well-Known Member
Clever Hans said:
Exactly but at the same time, they also lose the nugget players that are trapped on dead worlds for years and do not wish to join the new worlds. Not sure whether these DotD/Xmas cash grabs bring them enough profit to compensate for premium players that quit on other worlds while waiting for migrations. Especially since with each new world less and less players are willing to start from scratch, now that it takes forever to reach the max level.
Click to expand...

I second this, its actually worse for INNO in the long run cuz the new worlds attract many whales/big nugget spenders who go on a spree and then quit/get stuck when the world dies, luke is right, you'll find plenty of heavy nugget spenders sitting on dakota/kansas/montana with nothing worthwhile to spend on, that's an opportunity wasted in terms of $$$ for INNO, who should just allow migrations from these worlds.
 

kratjeuh

Member
mnnielsen said:
The new world will be in october - i have pushed it a bit to be able to test the server proberly.
An announcement will come in a few days
Click to expand...
If it's in October, it should be after the Octoberfest event has ended.

The world will have a rapid decline if players without (or with little) nuggets don't have time to scrape together a decent set meanwhile some nugget freak is running around with a 100% exp boosting weapon set.
 
Thanatoss

Thanatoss

Well-Known Member
sanidh said:
I second this, its actually worse for INNO in the long run cuz the new worlds attract many whales/big nugget spenders who go on a spree and then quit/get stuck when the world dies, luke is right, you'll find plenty of heavy nugget spenders sitting on dakota/kansas/montana with nothing worthwhile to spend on, that's an opportunity wasted in terms of $$$ for INNO, who should just allow migrations from these worlds.
Click to expand...
You are wrong. First of all most people here have a fixed amount they spend on the game. Most items can be bought on market so people on servers with big player base spend less nuggets as they can buy from others. Trust me they know better than you and me what is better for $$$
 

BigNoob

Ex-Team Member
Captura de ecrã 2024-09-27 180034.png
This picture says it all. You can open Ohio. It may beat Colorado the first month. But on month 2 it's gonna be just another world with less than 50 players, very low quality score and very low activity.
 

BigNoob

Ex-Team Member
Please do not get me wrong @mnnielsen I am completely fine with the opening of a new world. @Harsha.. is 100% right on what he said here:
Harsha.. said:
At this point, it doesn't really matter anymore.

Looking at things, most new players seem to spend some months on a new world and then they join Colorado eventually and play seriously there. Apart from that, there's a specific clique of players who do nothing, but jump among new worlds starting toons there and then abandoning them after the heady rush has passed. They know Colorado is the good world, but don't really care.

In my opinion, some good could be done with migration - where players can bring their favourite toons from dead worlds to colorado and they become more involved in the game. But it's my considered view that new worlds don't really have a tangible impact on Colorado anymore. Heck, the latest world, navajo is already so dead that opening of another world couldn't make it worse than it's at present.
Click to expand...
You can open a new world or 10 new worlds every year it doesnt change anything. New worlds arent a problem at all, they are just a way to pretend there is no problem.
 
Poker Alice

Poker Alice

Well-Known Member
Here is my own "unofficial" count (didn't look for any dupes - and it may not be 100% accurate) that came off the list from..

Vote

Omaha = 10
Oklahoma = 15
Oregon = 15
Ohio = 10
Ojai = 5
Oatman = 1
Ozark = 15

so I expect it will be anyone's guess what the name will be? :cooln:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top