Depends on your definition, but fort fight attendance average has already dropped well below Colorado’sDid vegas die already?
Don't know about Idaho but Juarez has one alliance owning all forts and transfering back forts to 2 smaller alliances to have some forts to dig each time they capture a fort, not really a definition of healthy.. Also 30 vs 30 fights are far from optimal.Of the “new worlds” (Idaho and up) Juarez probably has the healthiest long term potential on the fort fight front, and would’ve my personal (as a player) recommendation for a second world (after Colorado)
How interesting a post, there has never been a Clever Hans play in Juarez, plus it is untrue about one alliance owning all forts, they do however own a majority, because the alliance who has the most members stopped digging battles, there are 4 alliances with 50 plus members.Don't know about Idaho but Juarez has one alliance owning all forts and transfering back forts to 2 smaller alliances to have some forts to dig each time they capture a fort, not really a definition of healthy.. Also 30 vs 30 fights are far from optimal.
It's hard to recommend any other world besides Colorado for FFs at this point.
do keep in mind that many players have different names on different worldsHow interesting a post, there has never been a Clever Hans play in Juarez, plus it is untrue about one alliance owning all forts, they do however own a majority, because the alliance who has the most members stopped digging battles, there are 4 alliances with 50 plus members.
Also strange that talks with other members in the highest populated alliance, willing to continue fort fights, all of a sudden found themselves without an alliance.
So, who are you Clever Hans? What you are is a disgrace to this game.
What is a disgrace is your town accepting fort donations so that players can get slaughtered over and over in unbalanced fights for months now, leading to ever reducing battle attendance (around 30 vs 30 on a good day now). It is literally one town digging 80% of battles and always the same forts after they got captured and transfered back to your town. It is also the reason why the dominant alliance on that world doesn't own all the forts since you accept the fort handouts. And yeah, I do agree with you that Juarez has been dead for a while and most of the fighters have already quit while you and alikes keep paddling your stats in these fort donation friendlies. The fact all 4 alliances don't have more than 200 players left together says all how active that world is.How interesting a post, there has never been a Clever Hans play in Juarez, plus it is untrue about one alliance owning all forts, they do however own a majority, because the alliance who has the most members stopped digging battles, there are 4 alliances with 50 plus members.
Also strange that talks with other members in the highest populated alliance, willing to continue fort fights, all of a sudden found themselves without an alliance.
So, who are you Clever Hans? What you are is a disgrace to this game.
Like looking at a drawing, what do you see? A young woman or an old hag?What is a disgrace is your town accepting fort donations so that players can get slaughtered over and over in unbalanced fights for months now, leading to ever reducing battle attendance (around 30 vs 30 on a good day now). It is literally one town digging 80% of battles and always the same forts after they got captured and transfered back to your town. It is also the reason why the dominant alliance on that world doesn't own all the forts since you accept the fort handouts. And yeah, I do agree with you that Juarez has been dead for a while and most of the fighters have already quit while you and alikes keep paddling your stats in these fort donation friendlies. The fact all 4 alliances don't have more than 200 players left together says all how active that world is.
"My" facts can be checked by everyone at the fort overview, I leave the drawing impressions to you Terry.Like looking at a drawing, what do you see? A young woman or an old hag?
Again your facts are wrong Hans.