Sometimes simplifying a rule will either invalidate it or make it more restrictive than intended. There are MANY flaws in the new wording that need addressed. For example:
1. Age requirement would require some form of age verification program. We saw what happened when Google intentionally allowed children to register on YT, and Facebook is also guilty of this. In both cases, their ToS had an age requirement but did not enforce verification. Instead, a viable solution is to add in an acknowledgement during registration which states something along the lines of "This game may include mature content not suitable for minors. By clicking, you acknowledge personal responsibility that you are not restricted from said content by the laws of your country or territory."
2. As many others have stated, "noob" or "n00b" are derogatory terms. "Newb" is a short form of "newbie", which is an affectionate term for a new player. It should also be noted that words which are acceptable in one culture may be offensive in another. For example, "otaku" is considered acceptable in the US and even encouraged, but it is extremely derogatory in Japan and translates to "fanatic". A mod would have to not only consider the cultural meaning of a word or phrase, but also the context in which it is presented. Thus, it's easier to place a soft ban on insults or mockery with room for exceptions than it is to outright allow or disallow specific examples.
3. Support for terrorism is also something that requires better wording. For most, BLM is a segregationist/hate group that borders on domestic terrorism, but for a small number of people, they're heroes. Some people will tell you Boris Johnson is an anti-Scottish bigot, while others think he's a good politician. A blanket ban on discussing real life politics in-game would make much better sense, and banning any group that prioritises one demographic over another (i.e. is not all-inclusive) should likewise be banned under the discrimination clause in the ToS. Allowing one but not the other creates too much room for abuse.
Incidentally, a rule against supporting terrorists means the game should remove any references to Jesse James. He was an ex-Confederate soldier notorious for murdering and dismembering numerous individuals, both armed and unarmed, including shooting at least two children, as well as other horrific acts. His gang also wore KKK hoods in one of their robberies and were avid supporters of slavery (the James family itself owned several slaves). While he (and sometimes his brothers) have become popular among many modern youth, including him would be no different than including any other butcher as a "hero figure" in other settings.
4. The new wording regarding scripts should be reverted. I have been playing this game on and off for years, and the scripts are what allow me to enjoy it. Just about everything is either outdated or minimal in the actual game coding, and scripts such as TW Essentials or TW:CALC are what keep the game alive. Implying that all scripts are forbidden means you'll lose a lot of players who feel the game is no longer playable.
Think of the scripts as being similar to Fallout 4's Unofficial Fallout 4 Patch, which is a mod patch that fixes countless bugs and gameplay issues that Bethesda refuses to address. Scripts add quality of life gameplay by improving game menus, adding features that should have been in the base game (for example: If you want a Fancy Tie, why check every single town when you can do a search using TW-DB and locate the towns that actually sell it?). Sure, there are scripts out there that allow cheating, but (as discussed through most of this thread) the wording needs to be restored in the ToS that reflects this distinction. Also, ading a list of "acceptable" scripts doesn't require INNO to own those scripts, nor does it hold them reliable for the content. Just add in there that these are a "list of third-party scripts which do not violate the ToS and may therefore be used at the player's own risk".