Feedback Easter event 2026

Vertsida

Vertsida

Master of the West
Anyway lets not change topic and give them excuse to remove posts for suppression.

Yeah we need more friend slots, kenny approves.
 
BigNoob

BigNoob

Legend of The West ⭐
Ex-Team Member
Also I believe it is important to say that now Arizona not only fills medium fort battles it also fills large fort battles which means that now there are 2 worlds that fill large fort battles (Colorado and Arizona) while all of the other worlds dont fill small fort battles
Captura de ecrã 2026-04-08 134034.png
 
Last edited:
JWillow

JWillow

Legend of The West ⭐
Oh come on, why is having more players at fort battle a bad thing, it is allowed in the spam rules for overflow battles.

So where is the issue? Is it a lack of leaders for a second battle, confusion on where to set if you participate offline, or something else?

I keep seeing from players who have been around for ages that the number of players were higher and they some how figured it out.

Weird entitlement to have in a declining game.
 
Uchiha Madara

Uchiha Madara

Master of the West
JWillow said:
Oh come on, why is having more players at fort battle a bad thing, it is allowed in the spam rules for overflow battles.

So where is the issue? Is it a lack of leaders for a second battle, confusion on where to set if you participate offline, or something else?

I keep seeing from players who have been around for ages that the number of players were higher and they some how figured it out.

Weird entitlement to have in a declining game.
Click to expand...
It’s not a bad thing, in fact, it’s the opposite. It’s actually very positive. Now that Arizona has received migrating players, people effectively have two highly active worlds to choose from.


Arizona already sees a lot of overfilled battles, which means that with good coordination, it’s possible to run a second large battle on the same day. That’s a big advantage for overall activity.


It’s also fair to say that Arizona and Colorado are likely to remain the two most active worlds on .net. With future migrations, the number of battles could increase even further, leading to even more engagement and opportunities for players.
 
RaiderRt

RaiderRt

Master of the West
JWillow said:
Oh come on, why is having more players at fort battle a bad thing, it is allowed in the spam rules for overflow battles.

So where is the issue? Is it a lack of leaders for a second battle, confusion on where to set if you participate offline, or something else?

I keep seeing from players who have been around for ages that the number of players were higher and they some how figured it out.

Weird entitlement to have in a declining game.
Click to expand...
This game isn't declining. It's doing better than ever and Phoenix is the best thing in the history of humanity. Thats the bottom line because Barack Obama said so.
 
JWillow

JWillow

Legend of The West ⭐
Uchiha Madara said:
It’s not a bad thing, in fact, it’s the opposite. It’s actually very positive. Now that Arizona has received migrating players, people effectively have two highly active worlds to choose from.
Click to expand...
I personally don't think it is a bad thing, just was more wondering why others be acting like it is and was curious about the root cause.

If it is purely being left out, there are ways to fix that, ie more battles, but finding more leaders to have multiple battles at the same time, I could believe is an issue.

Though sounds like maybe I should check out the arizona scene, wasn't any fun the last time I tried a battle there, hehe.
 
JWillow

JWillow

Legend of The West ⭐
RaiderRt said:
This game isn't declining. It's doing better than ever and Phoenix is the best thing in the history of humanity. Thats the bottom line because Barack Obama said so.
Click to expand...
Really, I guess I will take your word for it, Wise One, though surprised a former president is invovled, but I guess everyone's got a hobby.
 
Vaggosr21

Vaggosr21

Master of the West
JWillow said:
I personally don't think it is a bad thing, just was more wondering why others be acting like it is and was curious about the root cause.

If it is purely being left out, there are ways to fix that, ie more battles, but finding more leaders to have multiple battles at the same time, I could believe is an issue.
Click to expand...
The game literally used to have x10 the players and everything worked just fine, when someone talks about "too many people" now has no idea how the game used to be. The more active a world is the better. There are multiple FFs a day and they make an extra one on awesomia for the ones left out the original one. No one loses anything, some people just want to talk negative about it.. It is what it is
 

WesternCalin

Legend of The West ⭐
JWillow said:
Oh come on, why is having more players at fort battle a bad thing, it is allowed in the spam rules for overflow battles.

So where is the issue? Is it a lack of leaders for a second battle, confusion on where to set if you participate offline, or something else?

I keep seeing from players who have been around for ages that the number of players were higher and they some how figured it out.

Weird entitlement to have in a declining game.
Click to expand...
I dont think people say that it's a bad thing to have multiple battles. The only caveat would be if having more battles means not all or the prime ones will fill which is clearly not happening. And the leaders situation it always is resolved, even if it's not the best leader there will be someone to step up and lead.
 
Abydos1

Abydos1

Legend of The West ⭐
What is the solution for overcrowded prime battles that have like 300 signed up on both sides like an NPC dug Awesomia battle that gives rewards?
 
Chief *Kounelos*

Chief *Kounelos*

New Member
Syntex said:
Friend system is not to farm infinite event currency. It is to connect with players who you like and engage.
Click to expand...
Thats true .But since more worlds come with the merges and maybe more will come on the future wouldnt be a bad idea to make it bigger either way.I only add like 3ppl from net servers cause of the limit.You can always nerf the numbers of the flowers etc that they give so its ballanced.
 

WesternCalin

Legend of The West ⭐
Abydos1 said:
What is the solution for overcrowded prime battles that have like 300 signed up on both sides like an NPC dug Awesomia battle that gives rewards?
Click to expand...
There is a solution in place already. If you signed up to first battle there will be a 2nd battle 1-2 days after where they can join only the ones that did sign up on the first battle and missed it due to high numbers of players.
 

WesternCalin

Legend of The West ⭐
I dont think i've seen 300. The most i've seen is almost 200 and the solution is for players to create overfill battles. In this case too there is an exemption in the rules about permitting such battles so we wont have them canceled by someone.
 
Abydos1

Abydos1

Legend of The West ⭐
WesternCalin said:
I dont think i've seen 300. The most i've seen is almost 200 and the solution is for players to create overfill battles. In this case too there is an exemption in the rules about permitting such battles so we wont have them canceled by someone.
Click to expand...
Well, I think this is a good time to look into adjusting those rules since now there are 2 worlds that have overcrowded prime large fort battles...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top