Can someone please tell me...

DeletedUser

You missed the part where I said I hate all of them apparently. Which means I don't cry for any of them.

And I don't doubt its a game to her. One of the things I despise the most right now is she is jockeying too hard to put herself in place for it. Doesn't mean I want to characterize attacking any of their kids as something that's ok. It has no place in the talks of politics for any of them.

BTW-why would anyone cry about those 2 scenarios? If you were a democrat or republican? You keep talking to me as if I am a Republican...

http://www.adultswim.com/video/?episodeID=8a2505951d1a2751011d24df55a8006a

Family Guy logic...I get a kick out of it...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

marcothys right. Regardless of how much you dislike someone you should never attack their kids or family. Just because politicians do doesn't make it right.

And it doesn't matter what political group I belong to, I didn't like any of them that was running.

Bill Clinton was a joke anyway .. his remark that what he did wasn't sex and wasn't cheating and Hillary backing him up on it make them both look like a joke.
 

DeletedUser

SmittenKitten said:
marcothys right. Regardless of how much you dislike someone you should never attack their kids or family. Just because politicians do doesn't make it right.

And it doesn't matter what political group I belong to, I didn't like any of them that was running.

Bill Clinton was a joke anyway .. his remark that what he did wasn't sex and wasn't cheating and Hillary backing him up on it make them both look like a joke.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:
 

DeletedUser

what is so bad about palin? i though she would have been a great vp. she had more foreign policy and executive experience then obama. yet was young and exciting like obama.

to me huckabee/palin in 12 would be awesome
 

DeletedUser

for one so does obama and for two she does. she had to work some deals with the candians over pipelines and she has to work with russia considering that alaska is only about 50 miles away from russia
 

DeletedUser

DanielBoone333 said:
for one so does obama and for two she does. she had to work some deals with the candians over pipelines and she has to work with russia considering that alaska is only about 50 miles away from russia
Click to expand...

She's had absolutely nothing to do with Russia. If proximity were an argument, then I suppose since she's close to the north pole, she's had experience with Santa...

As for the pipeline...she made her plans without the Canadian government and they are opposed to the project... You think that really is a shining example of forgein policy experience?
 

DeletedUser

but they are building the pipline she used diplomacy to get the canadians to let her do that.

and honestly you can not have a president with no executive experience like obama

most presedint were govaner or lead a company or somthing before they bacme presidient
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

DanielBoone333 said:
most presedint were govaner or lead a company or somthing before they bacme presidient
Click to expand...

Oh rly?
Examplify and back it up.
I'm sure we can find someone with little experience as a past president, or national leader somewhere whom did a bloody amazing job.
 

DeletedUser

DanielBoone333 said:
but they are building the pipline she used diplomacy to get the canadians to let her do that.
Click to expand...

Where are you getting that they are actually in the process of building the pipeline? I get that this project has been proposed only, and there are two competing projects by other sources (one of whom is by the Canadian government) for how to create this pipeline.
 

DeletedUser

DanielBoone333 said:
and honestly you can not have a president with no executive experience like obama
Click to expand...

Actually, his campaign was a 100 million dollar organization that employed over 500 people. I would call that executive experience.

But, even so...Bush had some executive experience...and he was a disaster. So, I'm not sure the kind of executive exerience that you're looking for is any indication of how good of a president one will be.
 

DeletedUser

Huckabee/Palin IMHO would mean 4 more years of implementing Socialism and selling of the country to China. Theres a long time before the next election for both Obama to do more screwups and Palin to do more screwups. I don't see either of them helping themselves in the next 2-3 years.

I'd either love to see a large amount of support go towards a 3rd party candidate early enough before the election where they are actually a viable candidate, or I would like to see more on Mitt Romney. I've seen enough on Obama, and like most all politicians-I wish there was a reset button.

Bush was also a coke head/and not quite a dodge drafter-not really sure how you would characterize his military experience.

But saying Obama received campaign experience from his campaign is laughable. Candidates do not on the contrary get involved in the day-to-day management of their campaign. The people running his campaign did an exceptional job-but this wasn't Obama's doing. It was much more David Plouf than Barrack Obama.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

marcothy said:
But saying Obama received campaign experience from his campaign is laughable. Candidates do not on the contrary get involved in the day-to-day management of their campaign. The people running his campaign did an exceptional job-but this wasn't Obama's doing. It was much more David Plouf than Barrack Obama.
Click to expand...

Yet, a CEO does get involved in the day-to-day management of a company? :rolleyes:
 

DeletedUser

Depends on how you define the day-to-day management. Thats different from paper pushing and taking phone calls..keyword being management.

Candidates do much more at the bidding of a capaign team than being an actual CEO calling all the shots.

When you define the CEO-the question is who acted more CEO-like, David Plouf or Barrack Obama. There were many aspects of the campaign that Barrack never even had to give a thought to.

But either way, he had more experience running a campaign than he had being a US Senator.

Obviously you are in support of Barrack. I hope you get your government run health care. Nothing makes my skin crawl more than to think I have to deal with the government more...
 

DeletedUser

marcothy said:
Depends on how you define the day-to-day management.
Click to expand...

You're the one that used the term first in this thread...you tell me.

This came about because someone complained that Obama didn't have executive experience. Their examples for what good executive experience is either running a company or governing a state.

You tell me...does a CEO or a Governor, under your definition, get involved in the day-to-day management of the company or the state?

How is their "executive experience" different from Obama's in terms of running a highly successful political campaign worth over 100 million dollars and with over 500 employees?
 

DeletedUser

Let me be the first to point out that a country isn't a company, nor should it be run like one.

You may carry on.
 

DeletedUser

Your experience running for a position doesn't quite qualify as experience for that position. It's like saying I am qualified to be a CFO because I have interviewed for one before, and I also manage my bank account.

Both arguments are rediculous. That either he should be pigeon-holed into coming from a certain background, and that running his campaign (something he did not do but David Plouf did) counts as that experience.

Is Obama inexperienced? Yes. But so was Kennedy and he was an excellent President.

Colin Powell doesn't have executive experience as outlined in Boone's statement (by the way, it comes mostly from Sean Hannedy (sp?). But I happen to think Powell would make an excellent President.

Obama has 1 critical flaw, and that is his arrogance of his own intelligence. He is very willing to say what he thinks without understanding the implications of what he says. Thats caused him the most trouble-both in his campaign and in his Presidency. That comes from a lack of experience in such of a weighted position.
 

DeletedUser

marcothy said:
Your experience running for a position doesn't quite qualify as experience for that position. It's like saying I am qualified to be a CFO because I have interviewed for one before, and I also manage my bank account.
Click to expand...

Er...bad analogy. Interviewing to become a CFO doesn't require that you be in charge of 100 million dollars and have a staff of 500 people to achieve your ends.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top