DeletedUser15368
Idea title:
Reassign current game worlds to better suit the needs of the community in 2020, and allow much needed and demanded world migrations.
Details of idea:
- Make World 1 a PvE world, where forts and duels are limited to "PvP quest events" run by the server administrators. This can potentially be done using the Time of Peace world setting. Adventures would be allowed, as they are an opt-in feature, unsure if they are affected by Peace time, or if this can even be set on a world by world basis... so unfortunately may require some development time to be realised
- Assign Arizona and Colorado* as the designated PvP worlds for .net
- Allow Briscoe and Galvaston to remain as they are, but with migration in and out of the worlds, for storage of old and spare accounts, possibly even reviving an extra two worlds.
- Open all migration routes to all worlds, close all extra worlds within 6 months. Plenty of time for players to decide which accounts to keep.
- Unsure what to do with Juarez. Maybe leave it as an un-moderated quarantine area where banned or troubling players can be moved to play with themselves for as long as their punishment lasts.
Visual Aid:
Reasons for submitting:
Dying dwindling player-base a fraction of the size in the game's prime. Non-functional PvP on half our worlds. Consolidating our small player-base which can support just 2 worlds. Giving casuals who hate being duelled their own world while reviving W1. We don't have any new players coming to the game, just old players who don't want to start again. Making The West Great Again.
* Players on Colorado will have more skill points from quests, than new world players will have bought. Skill point buying is also completely irrelevant in the modern game. If it really is a problem for some people, heavy SP buyers can be sent to Arizona.
PvE = Player Verses Environment - Questing, crafting and berry picking.
PvP = Player Verses Player - Duelling, fort fighting and adventuring, in addition to the PvE elements of the game which compliment PvP.
Reassign current game worlds to better suit the needs of the community in 2020, and allow much needed and demanded world migrations.
Details of idea:
- Make World 1 a PvE world, where forts and duels are limited to "PvP quest events" run by the server administrators. This can potentially be done using the Time of Peace world setting. Adventures would be allowed, as they are an opt-in feature, unsure if they are affected by Peace time, or if this can even be set on a world by world basis... so unfortunately may require some development time to be realised
- Assign Arizona and Colorado* as the designated PvP worlds for .net
- Allow Briscoe and Galvaston to remain as they are, but with migration in and out of the worlds, for storage of old and spare accounts, possibly even reviving an extra two worlds.
- Open all migration routes to all worlds, close all extra worlds within 6 months. Plenty of time for players to decide which accounts to keep.
- Unsure what to do with Juarez. Maybe leave it as an un-moderated quarantine area where banned or troubling players can be moved to play with themselves for as long as their punishment lasts.
Visual Aid:
Reasons for submitting:
Dying dwindling player-base a fraction of the size in the game's prime. Non-functional PvP on half our worlds. Consolidating our small player-base which can support just 2 worlds. Giving casuals who hate being duelled their own world while reviving W1. We don't have any new players coming to the game, just old players who don't want to start again. Making The West Great Again.
* Players on Colorado will have more skill points from quests, than new world players will have bought. Skill point buying is also completely irrelevant in the modern game. If it really is a problem for some people, heavy SP buyers can be sent to Arizona.
PvE = Player Verses Environment - Questing, crafting and berry picking.
PvP = Player Verses Player - Duelling, fort fighting and adventuring, in addition to the PvE elements of the game which compliment PvP.
Last edited by a moderator: