DeletedUser31931
So I just want to focus on female/male equality and one argument that is used in the centre of the whole equality argument thing. Tennis. Women get awarded the same amount of prize money as men although they only play 3 sets when men play 5 sets (this is referring to the ATP world tour.) Is this just?
Yes: Women are weaker and therefore the ratio of strength output (determined by power/num of sets) equals out to men and thus they should be paid the same amount
No: Although a woman is biologically weaker she can train to get stronger and although strongest woman wouldn't be as strong as the strongest man that is just natural selection so tough luck to women.
What are you views?
P.S. Before someone has a go at me for not stating my side I'm kind of neutral as both sides have good points I do tend to lead slightly towards the against women having equal pay.
Finally, keep it clean no sexist remarks etc. and please state evidence to back your wild claims or any of your claims for that matter, also I want this kept to tennis, if you want to discuss something else then set up another thread for it, don't use this one.
Yes: Women are weaker and therefore the ratio of strength output (determined by power/num of sets) equals out to men and thus they should be paid the same amount
No: Although a woman is biologically weaker she can train to get stronger and although strongest woman wouldn't be as strong as the strongest man that is just natural selection so tough luck to women.
What are you views?
P.S. Before someone has a go at me for not stating my side I'm kind of neutral as both sides have good points I do tend to lead slightly towards the against women having equal pay.
Finally, keep it clean no sexist remarks etc. and please state evidence to back your wild claims or any of your claims for that matter, also I want this kept to tennis, if you want to discuss something else then set up another thread for it, don't use this one.
Last edited by a moderator: